Recent Comments

  • DOuG pRATt: Such tremendous relief that it’s over. But all of the carnage…
  • jeaniebeanie: Good Lord. They nabbed him about two blocks from my second apartment in Watertown, on Laurel Street....
  • DOuG pRATt: Yeah, it’s truly a wild situation here. My friend across the street was heading home around...
  • jeaniebeanie: The entire world is focused on a part of Watertown that is a five-minute walk from my very first...
  • jeaniebeanie: Unbelievable! I was gone all day, no TV, then play rehearsal. Nobody even mentioned it! It’s...
  • DOuG pRATt: Annette had an excellent nose job. So did Marlo Thomas.
  • jeaniebeanie: Tom and I are so sad, but Annette’s up in heaven now, singing and dancing again! I haven’t...
  • DOuG pRATt: Great! You’re welcome.

Categories

Links

Archives

Titanic Folk-Rock

August 15th, 2012

Bob Dylan’s next record is going to have a long song about the sinking of the Titanic, 100 years ago. Dylan says,

“People are going to say: Well, it’s not very truthful. But a songwriter doesn’t care about what’s truthful. What he cares about is what should’ve happened, what could’ve happened. That’s its own kind of truth.”

That being the case, Dylan’s own take on the Titanic is fair game, and comic Tim Heidecker has recorded a speculative prediction of Bob’s as-yet-unheard song.

The thing is, Dylan is more than 40 years late, because the first and best extended fictional telling of the tale of the Titanic belongs to Jamie Brockett, who used an old Leadbelly song as a springboard. Brockett called the ship the USS for United States Ship, and not RMS for Royal Mail Ship, but hey man, it was 1969.

Filed under: Music

Leave a Comment

hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed