Recent Comments

  • DOuG pRATt: It’s a rare photo of what was a common scene.
  • Lia: I love that picture
  • DOuG pRATt: The title of this post is, as Denro noted above, a nod to the Firesign Theatre record, “How Can You...
  • jeaniebeanie: As for me, I love the visual pun that heads up this controversial blog! ;)
  • jeaniebeanie: Sacre bleu! She should sue!
  • Paul Howley: Glenn Becks’ life is an “open book”…his history has been revealed. Barack...
  • DOuG pRATt: I never questioned Beck’s right to hold the rally. Also, if it’s OK that Beck changed his...
  • DOuG pRATt: Oh. good point, Paul! I neglected to say that Sharpton is a total huckster. Frankly, I consider him to be...
  • Paul Howley: Palin, on the other hand, may be an idiot.
  • Paul Howley: How DARE someone hold a rally urging people to come together in a peaceful, non-violent way to encourage...

Links

Categories

Calendar

September 2009
S M T W T F S
« Aug   Oct »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Archives

STANd and deLEEver

September 1st, 2009

A long time ago, my world would have been rocked by the news that Disney is buying Marvel. Today the news interests me greatly, but I can’t think of any way that the purchase will have an effect on me personally.

The picture above of Stan Lee is noteworthy, because he’s standing next to Steve Ditko’s unpublished cover for “Amazing Fantasy” #15, the 1962 comic book that introduced Spider-Man. A similar drawing by Jack Kirby was used instead. In my opinion, Jack’s style didn’t suit the character, and I assume Stan felt the same way, because after that first cover he rarely had Jack draw Spidey. Jack included Spider-Man in his 1969 Marvelmania self-portrait, and even at the time that seemed wrong to me.

One of the most reliable hit-getters for this site is the BBC documentary, “In Search of Steve Ditko.” At this link you will find Stan talking about Ditko’s insistence that he is the co-creator of Spider-Man.

Stan is always lavish in his praise of the artists who worked for him in the Marvel Bullpen, and that’s great. Stan absolutely deserves everything he has received in money and recognition, and he has received a lot of both:

Lee sued Marvel, claiming he was owed profits from the Marvel films that had started to take Hollywood by storm. The suit was eventually settled with Lee reportedly getting a settlement of more than $10 million.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32645353/ns/business-media_biz/

But if Stan deserves the money and credit he has received, Steve Ditko deserves some of the same. With the BILLIONS of dollars now on the table, Ditko should get a million bucks and co-creator status for Spider-Man. Without the latter, it seems he won’t accept the former.

Filed under: All Posts, In Search of Steve Ditko

Leave a Comment

hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed