Recent Comments

  • tastewar: Thankfully, we had a little more room than that :-) I think at worst, the ones at work would hold three...
  • DOuG pRATt: Can the workstations at the office be considered quads?
  • tastewar: I shared a room (a “quad”) with 3 other guys freshman year, but we all got along well and it...
  • tastewar: We had a 12V powered thermoelectric cooler in our van for our XC trip. It was very handy for that. It...
  • DOuG pRATt: It’s a single room. Two of the walls are cinder block, and the other two may also be cinder block...
  • jeaniebeanie: Wheah’s the BEAH? JOKING! ;)
  • jeaniebeanie: Wait, wait, never mind, I can make out the cinder blocks!
  • jeaniebeanie: Does he have a wombmate? Oh, wait, that was YOU! ;) I mean, does he have just one roommate, and...
  • DOuG pRATt: It’s a rare photo of what was a common scene.
  • Lia: I love that picture

Links

Categories

Calendar

August 2009
S M T W T F S
« Jul   Sep »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Archives

Mad Men for 60’s fashions

August 14th, 2009

Carol and I are into the season 2 DVD’s of “Mad Men,” and one of the discs has a nifty mini-documentary that surveys 60’s fashions.

Get the Flash Player to see the wordTube Media Player.

Filed under: All Posts

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. DOuG pRATt  |  September 16th, 2009 at 1:17 am

    I just realized that nobody asked who the model is in the preview frame. She was a big name in 60’s fashions, but perhaps she was later overshadowed by Twiggy. That’s Jean Shrimpton.

    http://i267.photobucket.com/albums/ii306/Darelene223/JeanShrimpton.jpg

  • 2. jeaniebeanie  |  September 17th, 2009 at 10:07 am

    I remember her, of course, as we shared the same name. I couldn’t watch this when you first posted this, because my computer was being sluggish, and I couldn’t download it.

Leave a Comment

hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed