Recent Comments

  • Brian Sibley: The protest is Good News!
  • DOuG pRATt: She doesn’t neglect to make fun of runners, too!
  • jeanie beanie: Yup, thanks for expressing my sentiments exactly, Lily! I’m pretty much a Catholic in name only....
  • Lia: The dancers are so cool!! I want the sixties to come back!
  • DOuG pRATt: Agreed! We had “Peter Gunn” and other terrific tunes in America, but then the British...
  • DOuG pRATt: Dave – Well, it goes like this. In America we had Harry Belafonte and Sidney Poitier representing...
  • Bismo: I never get tired of that theme! Don’t know if you’ve seen it but I’ll send you a link of...
  • dave: Doug: Petula went on to advertise the Chrysler Sunbeam in Scotland, and probably England and Wales and possibly...
  • DOuG pRATt: Cars like these aren’t practical, but neither is the Hummer.
  • Paul Howley: Doug, “Truth in advertising” would force the Smart car to be called the Idiot-Mobile.

Links

Categories

Calendar

Archives

Oxi Fresh, Baby

October 3rd, 2008

The local paper had an item about the economy tanking, with a one-man carpet cleaning operation cited as an example. By coincidence a postcard came in the mail for a carpet cleaning franchise called OxiFresh.

OxiFresh postcard

Carol was really amused by this, and she had the following observations, which I admit didn’t occur to me.

  1. The woman is 40-ish
  2. The woman looks pregnant.
  3. The baby is under a year old.
  4. The baby appears to be gigantic.

Taking the techie point of view, I’m assuming Photoshop was used. One has to wonder who approved the picture. A pregnant 40-year-old woman whose baby is only crawling age?

Filed under: Life with Pratts

2 Comments

  • 1. jeaniebeanie  |  October 4th, 2008 at 9:07 am

    Ha! Great observations, Carol! James Lileks has built a career out of making such observations about the vast amount of ads, matchbooks, motel postcards, and other cultural icons of American history, past and present.

  • 2. Joan Stringer  |  October 5th, 2008 at 5:06 am

    Wee-ell, 2 observations: 1) If you took the picture literally, wouldn’t you wonder what chemicals were in Oxi-Fresh that made the baby so large? And 2) Could her fertile condition be the result of the friendly Oxi-Fresh man doing an annual visit and carpet cleaning? It does seem to be an odd choice of picture to use.

Trackback this post