Recent Comments

  • DOuG pRATt: It’s a rare photo of what was a common scene.
  • Lia: I love that picture
  • DOuG pRATt: The title of this post is, as Denro noted above, a nod to the Firesign Theatre record, “How Can You...
  • jeaniebeanie: As for me, I love the visual pun that heads up this controversial blog! ;)
  • jeaniebeanie: Sacre bleu! She should sue!
  • Paul Howley: Glenn Becks’ life is an “open book”…his history has been revealed. Barack...
  • DOuG pRATt: I never questioned Beck’s right to hold the rally. Also, if it’s OK that Beck changed his...
  • DOuG pRATt: Oh. good point, Paul! I neglected to say that Sharpton is a total huckster. Frankly, I consider him to be...
  • Paul Howley: Palin, on the other hand, may be an idiot.
  • Paul Howley: How DARE someone hold a rally urging people to come together in a peaceful, non-violent way to encourage...

Links

Categories

Calendar

November 2007
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Archive for November 6th, 2007

Sputtering After Sputnik

Sputnik - 1957

Science News is a consistently excellent weekly magazine for keeping up with what’s really happening in the various scientific disciplines. I enjoyed reading an article about the launching of Sputnik 50 years ago. Something I didn’t know is that the launch was no surprise to American scientists, who were looking forward to it. America’s first attempt at a satellite launch was spectacular, but not successful:

On Dec. 6, the press was invited to Cape Canaveral, Fla., to witness the U.S. response to Sputnik. Newsreel cameras rolled as a modified Navy Vanguard rocket carrying a small satellite lifted off the launch pad. It rose just 4 feet before erupting in a fireball, sending the grapefruit-size satellite in its nose cone hurtling across the sands. The next day’s headlines provided the postmortem: “Flopnik,” “Dudnik,” “Kaputnik.”

You can read the article by clicking here.

Add comment November 6th, 2007