Recent Comments

  • DOuG pRATt: It’s a rare photo of what was a common scene.
  • Lia: I love that picture
  • DOuG pRATt: The title of this post is, as Denro noted above, a nod to the Firesign Theatre record, “How Can You...
  • jeaniebeanie: As for me, I love the visual pun that heads up this controversial blog! ;)
  • jeaniebeanie: Sacre bleu! She should sue!
  • Paul Howley: Glenn Becks’ life is an “open book”…his history has been revealed. Barack...
  • DOuG pRATt: I never questioned Beck’s right to hold the rally. Also, if it’s OK that Beck changed his...
  • DOuG pRATt: Oh. good point, Paul! I neglected to say that Sharpton is a total huckster. Frankly, I consider him to be...
  • Paul Howley: Palin, on the other hand, may be an idiot.
  • Paul Howley: How DARE someone hold a rally urging people to come together in a peaceful, non-violent way to encourage...

Links

Categories

Calendar

Archives

More HELP!

October 11th, 2006

As mentioned several weeks ago, the first time Monty Python members John Cleese and Terry Gilliam worked together was in a humor magazine called HELP!  In issue #24, cover date May 1965, an impossibly young-looking Cleese appeared in a fumetti (photo comic) titled, “Christopher’s Punctured Romance.”  It seems fitting to present it now, immediately after viewing the videos of Stephen Colbert’s deft jabs at feminine and feminist stereotypes in the previous posts.  I would suspect that the author’s name, Dave Crossley, is a pseudonym for Cleese himself *, but I have been unable to confirm whether or not that’s true.  For me, the use of the name “Jennings” in the story is something of a giveaway.  Also, I once spoke with HELP!’s creator and editor, Harvey Kurtzman, about this story and I don’t recall him referring to anyone other than Cleese being involved, except for the fact it was Gilliam who had found him performing off-off-Broadway with a British troupe called the Cambridge Circus.

*See comments

A complete, uncensored scan of “Christopher’s Punctured Romance” is in the gallery, and can be viewed by clicking the PG-13 logo.  I have applied this rating because, as described by one friend, “it’s a bit perverse;”  but, then, so was a lot of Monty Python’s material.  The story works on many levels, being subversive and, yes, somewhat obscene.  But it’s a sharp critique of a male-female value system that was changing rapidly in the mid-60’s, as well as a scathing indictment of the true symbolism of Barbie™, beyond its popularity as a mere toy.  I would characterize it as depravity in the service of enlightenment.

NOTE:  Grateful acknowledgment is hereby given to Dennis F. Rogers for loan of his copy of the original magazine.

Filed under: All Posts

2 Comments

  • 1. jeanie beanie  |  October 12th, 2006 at 4:17 pm

    VERY FUNNY! Of course, the infamous BRATZ dolls make “Barbee” look like an 80-year-old nun. They all have thong underwear, even the “Baby Bratz!” I taught Molly from an early age to steer clear of these bitches. However, I can just imagine the number of “daddies” out there who make secret forays into their daughter’s rooms at night, in the throes of … a “BRATZ ATTACK!” SICK!

  • 2. DogRat  |  October 12th, 2006 at 4:29 pm

    Mr. D.F.Rogers has found a reference that I missed, to Dave Crossley being a real person:

    http://www.tcj.com/2_archives/i_shelton.html

    Dennis’ recollection is that the script was written before Cleese was spotted as a good candidate for the role.

Trackback this post